From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Von Raesfeld v. Paige

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 28, 2016
Case No. 16-CV-06497-LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 16-CV-06497-LHK

11-28-2016

MYRON VON RAESFELD, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON PAIGE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING CASE

Re: Dkt. No. 4

This case is an unlawful detainer action that was referred to Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Judge Lloyd has made a report and recommendation that the District Judge grant Plaintiff's motion for remand because this action was improperly removed. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed and served on November 9, 2016. No objections have been filed, and the time to file objections has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as the record in this case, the court finds that the Report and Recommendation is well-founded in fact and in law and, therefore, adopts the Report and Recommendation. This case is hereby REMANDED to the Santa Clara County Superior Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 28, 2016

/s/_________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Von Raesfeld v. Paige

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 28, 2016
Case No. 16-CV-06497-LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Von Raesfeld v. Paige

Case Details

Full title:MYRON VON RAESFELD, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON PAIGE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 28, 2016

Citations

Case No. 16-CV-06497-LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2016)