From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Von Karl v. Oregon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Mar 6, 2017
No. 3:17-cv-00288-MO (D. Or. Mar. 6, 2017)

Opinion

No. 3:17-cv-00288-MO

03-06-2017

GIA VON KARL, Plaintiff, v. OREGON, et al., Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER MOSMAN, J.,

Plaintiff, through a purported "Authorized Representative" named Jayasri Bhalla El, filed a Complaint [2] against multiple defendants based on allegations that they have violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and that they have harassed, extorted, and threatened to convict Plaintiff for a traffic violation. Plaintiff also filed an Application to Proceed in forma pauperis [1], which also appears to be signed by Jayasri Bhalla El.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), a complaint filed in forma pauperis must be dismissed before service of process if it fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Plaintiff may not be represented in Federal Court by an "authorized representative" who is not an attorney. Thus, Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in forma pauperis [1] is DENIED and the Complaint [2] is DISMISSED, without service of process

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 6th day of March, 2017.

/s/_________

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Von Karl v. Oregon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Mar 6, 2017
No. 3:17-cv-00288-MO (D. Or. Mar. 6, 2017)
Case details for

Von Karl v. Oregon

Case Details

Full title:GIA VON KARL, Plaintiff, v. OREGON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Mar 6, 2017

Citations

No. 3:17-cv-00288-MO (D. Or. Mar. 6, 2017)