From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Von Holt v. Izumo Taisha Kyo Mission

Supreme Court of Hawaii
May 16, 1960
355 P.2d 40 (Haw. 1960)

Opinion

No. 4144.

May 16, 1960.

TSUKIYAMA, C.J., MARUMOTO, CASSIDY, WIRTZ AND LEWIS, JJ.

Norman K. Chung for respondent-appellant, City and County of Honolulu.

Robert M. Rothwell for petitioner-appellee.


The petition for rehearing is granted. Argument will be had on June 30, 1960, at 9:00 A.M.

Counsel are directed to file briefs on the following questions:

(1) Under the facts presented in this case, and without consideration of R.L.H. 1955, Chapter 219, can appellee be allowed an attorney's fee?

(2) If so, does such allowance constitute taxation of "costs" within the meaning of the first sentence of R.L.H. 1955, § 219-23?

The Opening Brief shall be filed within 20 days, the Answering Brief within 35 days and the Reply Brief within 40 days from the date hereof.


Summaries of

Von Holt v. Izumo Taisha Kyo Mission

Supreme Court of Hawaii
May 16, 1960
355 P.2d 40 (Haw. 1960)
Case details for

Von Holt v. Izumo Taisha Kyo Mission

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN V. VON HOLT v. IZUMO TAISHA KYO MISSION OF HAWAII, AN INCORPORATED…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: May 16, 1960

Citations

355 P.2d 40 (Haw. 1960)
355 P.2d 40

Citing Cases

Olokele Sugar Co. v. McCabe, Hamilton Renny Co.

In Yokochi v. Yoshimoto, 44 Haw. 297, 307, 353 P.2d 820, 826 (1960), while rejecting a claim for attorneys'…