From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Volpicelli v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 14, 2017
No. 70646 (Nev. App. Jun. 14, 2017)

Opinion

No. 70646

06-14-2017

FERRILL JOSEPH VOLPICELLI, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Ferrill Volpicelli appeals from an order of the district court denying the motion to correct an illegal sentence he filed on March 30, 2016. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Elliott A. Sattler, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument and we conclude the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. NRAP 34(f)(3), (g). --------

In his motion, Volpicelli claimed his sentence was illegal because the amount of restitution imposed was incorrect. Volpicelli failed to demonstrate his sentence was facially illegal or the district court lacked jurisdiction. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Therefore, we conclude the district court did not err in denying Volpicelli's motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver /s/_________, J.
Tao /s/_________, J.
Gibbons cc: Hon. Elliott A. Sattler, District Judge

Ferrill Joseph Volpicelli

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Volpicelli v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 14, 2017
No. 70646 (Nev. App. Jun. 14, 2017)
Case details for

Volpicelli v. State

Case Details

Full title:FERRILL JOSEPH VOLPICELLI, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 14, 2017

Citations

No. 70646 (Nev. App. Jun. 14, 2017)