From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Volpe v. Drelich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1999
266 A.D.2d 70 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

November 16, 1999

Andrew Lavott Bluestone, for Plaintiff-Respondent.

Jonathan T. Uejio, for Defendant-Appellant

WILLIAMS, J.P., RUBIN, SAXE, FRIEDMAN, JJ.


Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about December 9, 1998, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant-appellant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this legal malpractice action, factual issues exist as to whether "but for" the law firm's negligence, plaintiff would have prevailed in the underlying action (see, Pacesetter Communications Corp. v. Solin Breindel, P.C., 150 A.D.2d 232, 233, lv dismissed 74 N.Y.2d 892). Plaintiff's account of her accident and the surrounding circumstances raised factual issues as to the landowner's liability that were sufficient to preclude summary judgment on her malpractice claim.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Volpe v. Drelich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1999
266 A.D.2d 70 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Volpe v. Drelich

Case Details

Full title:SHERRI LEFKOWITZ VOLPE, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STEVEN DRELICH, Esq.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 70 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
698 N.Y.S.2d 463