From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vollmering v. Assaggio Honolulu, LLC

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Oct 6, 2022
Civil Action 2:22-CV-00002 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 6, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:22-CV-00002

10-06-2022

SCARLETT VOLLMERING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ASSAGGIO HONOLULU, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NELVA GONZALES RAMOS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On September 19, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock issued a “Memorandum and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge” (M&R, D.E. 37). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's M&R. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed.

When no timely objection to a magistrate judge's M&R is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge's M&R. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).

Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge's M&R (D.E. 37), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Assaggio Honolulu, LLC's and Sang Sananikone's motion to compel arbitration with Plaintiffs (D.E. 30) is GRANTED IN PART (with regard to Assaggio) and DENIED IN PART (with regard to Sananikone), and Plaintiffs and Assaggio are ORDERED to submit their dispute to binding arbitration.

The Court GRANTS HRMSTX, Inc.'s motion to compel arbitration with Plaintiffs (D.E. 31) and Plaintiffs and HRMSTX are ORDERED to submit their dispute to binding arbitration.

The Court GRANTS HRMSTX's motion to compel arbitration with Assaggio and Sananikone (D.E. 31) and ORDERS that HRMSTX, Assaggio, and Sananikone submit their dispute to binding arbitration.

The Court STAYS this action pending completion of the arbitration proceedings. The Court further ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSES this case and ORDERS that any party may move to reinstate the case on the active docket within seven days after the first arbitration award issues.


Summaries of

Vollmering v. Assaggio Honolulu, LLC

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Oct 6, 2022
Civil Action 2:22-CV-00002 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Vollmering v. Assaggio Honolulu, LLC

Case Details

Full title:SCARLETT VOLLMERING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ASSAGGIO HONOLULU, LLC, et…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Oct 6, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 2:22-CV-00002 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 6, 2022)

Citing Cases

Seifert v. United Built Homes, LLC

Morgan, 142 S. Ct. at 1713.Vollmering v. Assaggio Honolulu, LLC, No. 2:22-CV-00002, 2022 WL 6246881, at *12…

Engebretson v. Randoh-Brooks Fed. Credit Union

The Fifth Circuit has since remanded an arbitration-waiver case for further consideration in light of…