Opinion
2:22-cv-00610-JCM-BNW
08-18-2022
PAUL JEFFREY VOLL, an Individual, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID N. KARPEL, individually, DOES 1 through 100; and ROES 1 through 100; inclusive, Defendants.
BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Ass't Attorney General Civil Division C. SALVATORE D'ALESSIO, JR. Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division ANDREA W. MCCARTHY Acting Ass't Director Torts Branch, Civil Division Jacob A. Bennett Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division Constitutional and Specialized Tort Litigation Attorneys for Defendants the United States and David Karpel
BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Ass't Attorney General Civil Division
C. SALVATORE D'ALESSIO, JR. Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
ANDREA W. MCCARTHY Acting Ass't Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
Jacob A. Bennett Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division Constitutional and Specialized Tort Litigation
Attorneys for Defendants the United States and David Karpel
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR UNITED STATES' RESPONSE (FIRST REQUESTED EXTENSION)
BRENDA WEKSLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, Defendants the United States of America and David Karpel, and Plaintiff Paul Jeffrey Voll (collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate to an extension of time for the United States to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. This is the first stipulation for an extension. The reason for this stipulation is to align the due date for the United States' response to the Complaint with the due date for Defendant David Karpel's response. Both the United States and Defendant Karpel intend to file motions to dismiss. Aligning the due dates for their responses would facilitate a consolidated briefing schedule for their motions, which would serve the purpose of judicial economy.
The United States' response is currently due August 29, 2022. Defendant Karpel's response is currently due October 7, 2022. The parties stipulate that the United States' response will now also be due October 7, 2022. The parties further stipulate that Plaintiff will have thirty-
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that ECF No. 10 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part without prejudice. It is granted to the extent that the United States' response will be due October 7, 2022. It is denied to the extent the parties seek a longer briefing schedule on the motion to dismiss, as such a request is for the District Judge assigned to this case and must be filed in a separate stipulation. See LR IC 2-2(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.