From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Volino v. Island

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 2008
53 A.D.3d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2008-01649.

July 8, 2008.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), entered January 28, 2008, which denied that branch of his motion which was for post-note of issue discovery.

Mark J. Rayo, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Louis A. Badolato of counsel), for appellant.

Lewis Johs Avallone Aviles, LLP, Riverhead, N.Y. (Brian J. Greenwood of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Miller, Carni and Chambers, JJ.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for post-note of issue discovery is granted.

Upon the particular circumstances of this case it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for post-note of issue discovery ( see 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]).


Summaries of

Volino v. Island

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 2008
53 A.D.3d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Volino v. Island

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD VOLINO, Appellant, v. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 8, 2008

Citations

53 A.D.3d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 6205
859 N.Y.S.2d 870