From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Volgstadt v. Jamestown Scrap Corp., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1994
207 A.D.2d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

September 30, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted part of plaintiff's motion to compel disclosure. Because plaintiff must prove malice, he is entitled to disclosure of evidence of defendants' knowledge and motivation at the time the alleged defamatory statements were made (see, Mansour v. Abrams, 144 A.D.2d 905; see generally, Freeman v Johnston, 84 N.Y.2d 52; Liberman v. Gelstein, 80 N.Y.2d 429). The court also properly denied defendants' cross motion for summary judgment (see, CPLR 3212 [f]; Blue Bird Coach Lines v. 107 Delaware Ave., 125 A.D.2d 971; see also, Mansour v. Abrams, supra).


Summaries of

Volgstadt v. Jamestown Scrap Corp., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1994
207 A.D.2d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Volgstadt v. Jamestown Scrap Corp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE VOLGSTADT, Respondent, v. JAMESTOWN SCRAP CORPORATION, INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 830

Citing Cases

Krusen v. Moss

In view of these allegations, as well as the specific statements at issue, we are satisfied that plaintiff…