From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Volfman v. In Thursday Namu LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 10, 2022
22-cv-7092 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-7092 (ER)

11-10-2022

JOSEPH VOLFMAN, Plaintiff, v. IN THURSDAY NAMU LLC, doing business as Mokyo, and BENCHMARK 109 LLC, Defendants.


ORDER

Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J.

The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, Doc. 16, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within thirty (30) days of the date hereof.

Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty (30) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next thirty (30) days with a request that the agreement be “so ordered” by the Court.

It is SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Volfman v. In Thursday Namu LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 10, 2022
22-cv-7092 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Volfman v. In Thursday Namu LLC

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH VOLFMAN, Plaintiff, v. IN THURSDAY NAMU LLC, doing business as…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 10, 2022

Citations

22-cv-7092 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2022)