From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Voice Tech Corp. v. Mycroft AI Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
May 6, 2024
No. 2023-1033 (Fed. Cir. May. 6, 2024)

Opinion

2023-1033

05-06-2024

VOICE TECH CORP., Appellant v. MYCROFT AI INC., Appellee

ERIC MICHAEL ADAMS, Tumey LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellant. SANJIV P. LAUD, McCurdy LLC, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellee. Also represented by ALEXANDRA H. MOSS, Public Interest Patent Law Institute, South Pasadena, CA.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-01739.

ERIC MICHAEL ADAMS, Tumey LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellant.

SANJIV P. LAUD, McCurdy LLC, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellee. Also represented by ALEXANDRA H. MOSS, Public Interest Patent Law Institute, South Pasadena, CA.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM

LOURIE, CHEN, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Voice Tech Corp. v. Mycroft AI Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
May 6, 2024
No. 2023-1033 (Fed. Cir. May. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Voice Tech Corp. v. Mycroft AI Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VOICE TECH CORP., Appellant v. MYCROFT AI INC., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: May 6, 2024

Citations

No. 2023-1033 (Fed. Cir. May. 6, 2024)