From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vogt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 26, 1991
581 So. 2d 250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-01778.

June 26, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Susan C. Bucklew, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


As to the first issue, we affirm on the basis of Quarterman v. State, 527 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 1988) and Smith v. State, 529 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 1988). As to the second issue, we affirm special condition 27 of Mr. Vogt's probation, as it reasonably relates to the crimes for which he was convicted and is not unreasonably vague or restrictive, given the facts of this case. Conversely, we strike special condition 6 because it has no reasonable relation to Mr. Vogt's offenses or his rehabilitation.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vogt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 26, 1991
581 So. 2d 250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Vogt v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM M. VOGT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 26, 1991

Citations

581 So. 2d 250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)