Vogt v. Jefferson Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

Full title: MATTHEW VOGT, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DEPUTY…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Mar 22, 2017

3:14-CV-01224-PK (D. Or. Mar. 22, 2017)

Opinion

3:14-CV-01224-PK

03-22-2017

MATTHEW VOGT, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DEPUTY SKIDGEL, and CAPTAIN HECKATHORN, Defendants.

BROWN, Judge.

ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#88) on November 3, 2016, in which he recommends this Court grant Defendants' Motion (#44) for Summary Judgment and dismiss this matter. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9^th Cir. 2009). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9^th Cir. 2003)(en banc). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (#88). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion (#44) for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 22^nd day of March, 2017.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge