Opinion
October, 1911.
Present — Ingraham, P.J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Miller, JJ.
The order should be affirmed, without costs, upon the ground that the proof of demand for payment of the alimony due is insufficient, with leave, however, to the plaintiff to renew the motion upon a proper demand being made, and upon such additional papers as plaintiff may be advised.
Order affirmed, without costs.