From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Voessler v. Palm Fetchteler Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 21, 1939
5 A.2d 753 (N.J. 1939)

Opinion

Argued February 8, 1939 —

Decided April 21, 1939.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 120 N.J.L. 553.

For the respondent-appellant, Edwin J. O'Brien, William J. Egan, assistant attorney-general ( Stephen J. Lorenz, of counsel).

For the petitioner-respondent, Henry Harris.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court. Under its seventh point the appellant calls our attention to Pamph. L. 1938, ch. 198, p. 474 ( R.S. 34:15-94, 95 and 95.1). This amendment was approved May 18th, 1938, and went into effect immediately. The cause here under consideration was submitted to the Supreme Court at the May term, 1938. The amendment does not affect the judgment in this cause because it is not retroactive.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Voessler v. Palm Fetchteler Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 21, 1939
5 A.2d 753 (N.J. 1939)
Case details for

Voessler v. Palm Fetchteler Co.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM VOESSLER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. PALM FETCHTELER COMPANY…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 21, 1939

Citations

5 A.2d 753 (N.J. 1939)
5 A.2d 753

Citing Cases

Wexler v. Lambrecht Foods

A proceeding against the Fund is thus contemplated to follow the compensation proceeding against the…

Harper v. New Jersey Mfrs. Cas. Ins. Co.

The courts have referred to the fund as "tax moneys". Voessler v. PalmFetchteler Co., 120 N.J.L. 553…