Opinion
January, 1928
Order modified by changing the terms upon which the opening of the default was granted, from the payment of taxable costs to date, to the payment by defendant of twenty-five dollars costs. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. We are of opinion that the action of the justice presiding was not a proper exercise of discretion. Young, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur; Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., dissent, being of opinion that the discretion exercised by the justice presiding should not be disturbed.