prosecuting attorneys engaged in prosecutorial misconduct when they recklessly disregarded their obligation to provide information specifically requested by detainee, thereby endangering detainee's defense
Summary of this case from Wang v. RenoNo. 94-239.
October 3, 1994.
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE O'CONNOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 21 Cal. App. 4th 1673, 26 Cal. Rptr. 2d 802.
prosecuting attorneys engaged in prosecutorial misconduct when they recklessly disregarded their obligation to provide information specifically requested by detainee, thereby endangering detainee's defense
Summary of this case from Wang v. RenoFull title:VOAKES v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 3, 1994
See, e.g., In re Wells Fargo Sec. Litig., 12 F.3d 922, 927 (9th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 295…
In re Syntex Corp. Securities LitigationWe review de novo the district court's order dismissing a case for failure to state a claim. In re Wells…