V&M Aerospace LLC v. V&M Co.

10 Citing cases

  1. Sat Tech. v. CECO Envtl. Corp.

    1:18-cv-907 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 19, 2023)

    But that CECO had a right to seek indemnity from SAT for SAT's alleged breach does not mean the agreement granted CECO the right to exercise a selfhelp remedy to offset its losses by withholding other payments it had to make. Produce Holdings, Inc. v. Benson Hill Fresh, LLC, No. 2019-0599-JTL, 2020 WL 1188052, at *4 (Del. Ch. Mar. 11, 2020) (distinguishing between indemnification and other self-help remedies and explaining that a buyer in a stock purchase agreement could not argue its non-performance was excused by the seller's alleged “breaches of the representations and warranties” because the buyer had expressly bargained for an indemnification remedy and not “the self-help remedy [it] [ha]d ... invoked”); V&M Aerospace LLC v. V&M Co., C. A. No. N18C-09-189 AML CCLD, 2019 WL 3238920, at *5 (Del. Super. Ct. July 18, 2019) (“The offset right is not indemnification. Rather, offset simply affords preliminary relief while the parties resolve their indemnification obligations.”)

  2. Ford Motor Co. v. Earthbound LLC

    C. A. N23C-06-237 PRW CCLD (Del. Super. Ct. Jun. 5, 2024)   Cited 1 times

    E.g., Silver Lake, 2014 WL 595378, at *6; see generally Del. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 56(h). Indian Harbor Ins. Co. v. SharkNinja Operating LLC, 2020 WL 6795965, at *3 (Del. Super. Ct. Nov. 19, 2020) (internal quotations and citation omitted); see also V&M Aerospace LLC v. V&M Co., 2019 WL 3238920, at *3-4 (Del. Super. Ct. July 18, 2019) (concluding that the difference between judgment on the pleadings standard and the summary judgment standard was "immaterial" because a "question of law" alone was involved). But, the mere presence of cross-dispositive motions "does not act per se as a concession that there is an absence of factual issues."

  3. Movora, LLC v. Gendreau

    C. A. N23C-05-034 MAA CCLD (Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 18, 2024)   Cited 1 times

    . Id. (citing V&M Aerospace LLC v. V&M Co., 2019 WL 3238920, at *3 (Del. Super. July 18, 2019)). Id. (quoting Lillis v. AT&T Corp., 904 A.2d 325, 329-30 (Del. Ch. 2006))

  4. Graphic Packaging Int'l, LLC v. Everest Nat'l Ins. Co.

    N22C-03-192 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Ct. May. 8, 2023)   Cited 1 times

    (Internal quotation marks omitted)). V&M Aerospace LLC v. V&M Co., 2019 WL 3238920, at *3 (Del. Super. Ct. July 18, 2019). Lillis v. AT&T Corp., 904 A.2d 325, 329-30 (Del. Ch. 2006) (alteration omitted); see also VLIW Tech., LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 840 A.2d 606, 615 (Del. 2003) (observing that ambiguity creates a fact dispute and that a court cannot dismiss breach of contract allegations unless the movant's construction of the disputed term "is the only reasonable construction as a matter of law").

  5. Bay Point Capital Partners L.P. v. Fitness Recovery Holdings, LLC

    N21C-03-072 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Ct. Nov. 30, 2021)

    (internal quotation marks omitted)).V&M Aerospace LLC v. V&M Co., 2019 WL 3238920, at *3 (Del. Super. Ct. July 18, 2019).Lillis v. AT&T Corp., 904 A.2d 325, 329-30 (Del. Ch. 2006) (alteration omitted); see also VLIW Tech., LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 840 A.2d 606, 615 (Del. 2003) (observing that ambiguity creates a fact dispute and that a court cannot dismiss breach of contract allegations unless the movant's construction of the disputed term "is the only reasonable construction as a matter of law").

  6. Intermec IP Corp. v. Transcore, LP

    C. A. N20C-03-254 PRW CCLD (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 16, 2021)   Cited 41 times

    Indian Harbor Ins. Co. v. SharkNinja Operating LLC, 2020 WL 6795965, at *3 (Del. Super. Ct. Nov. 19, 2020) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also V&M Aerospace LLC v. V&M Co., 2019 WL 3238920, at *3-4 (Del. Super. Ct. July 18, 2019) (concluding that the difference between judgment on the pleadings standard and the summary judgment standard was "immaterial" because a "question of law" alone was involved).United Vanguard Fund, Inc. v. TakeCare, Inc., 693 A.2d 1076, 1079 (Del. 1997).

  7. Aveanna Healthcare, LLC v. Epic/Freedom, LLC

    C.A. No. N20C-08-055 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Ct. Jul. 29, 2021)   Cited 31 times
    Holding denial or extension of a Motion to Dismiss "is appropriate where the core facts needed to oppose summary judgment are within the exclusive knowledge of the movant," and have not been produced in discovery

    (internal quotation marks omitted)).V&M Aerospace LLC v. V&M Co., 2019 WL 3238920, at *3 (Del. Super. Ct. July 18, 2019). ANALYSIS

  8. Sycamore Partners Mgmt., L.P. v. Endurance Am. Ins. Co.

    C.A. No. N18C-09-211 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 26, 2021)   Cited 9 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Super. Ct. Nov. 1, 2017) (importing same liberal construction into review of motion for "partial" judgment on the pleadings). V&M Aerospace LLC v. V&M Co., 2019 WL 3238920, at *3 (Del. Super. Ct. July 18, 2019) (citations omitted). ANALYSIS

  9. Verizon Commc'ns Inc. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh

    C.A. No. N18C-08-086 EMD CCLD (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 23, 2021)   Cited 5 times

    (internal quotation marks omitted). V&M Aerospace LLC v. V&M Co., 2019 WL 3238920, at *3 (Del. Super. Ct. July 18, 2019) (citation omitted). B. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

  10. Northrop Grumman Innovation Sys. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.

    C.A. No. N18C-09-210 PRW CCLD (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 2, 2021)   Cited 29 times   3 Legal Analyses

    Super. Ct. Jan. 17, 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted))). V&M Aerospace LLC v. V&M Co., 2019 WL 3238920, at *3 (Del. Super. Ct. July 18, 2019) (citations omitted). B. SUMMARY JUDGMENT.