From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

VIZCAINO v. US PTO

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 3, 2006
No. CIV S-05-2646 DFL DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-2646 DFL DAD PS.

August 3, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On June 7, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 7, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed.


Summaries of

VIZCAINO v. US PTO

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 3, 2006
No. CIV S-05-2646 DFL DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)
Case details for

VIZCAINO v. US PTO

Case Details

Full title:JESSE VIZCAINO, JR., Plaintiff, v. US PTO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 3, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-2646 DFL DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)