From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Viza Elecs. v. Ram Dandillaya Paradigm Clinical Research Inst.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Nov 29, 2022
3:22-cv-00049-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00049-MOC-DCK

11-29-2022

VIZA ELECTRONICS, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. RAM DANDILLAYA PARADIGM CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. JUAN DE BORBON Y DE ROJAS, Defendants.


ORDER CONCERNING SECTION 636(c) REFERRAL

MAX O. COGBURN JR., DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on its own motion regarding the parties' consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge, submitted in accordance with 28, United States Code, Section 636(c), Rule 73, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Civil Rule 73.1.

In accordance with the Amended Standing Order of Referral (#2), 3:11mc25 (effective January 1, 2019), the Court has considered reassignment of this matter based on the written consent of the parties. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is HEREBY directed to:

[x] Assign this matter to a United States Magistrate Judge; or
[] Vacate the Section 636(c) referral in accordance with Rule 73(c) and retain the assignment with the United States District Judge.


Summaries of

Viza Elecs. v. Ram Dandillaya Paradigm Clinical Research Inst.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Nov 29, 2022
3:22-cv-00049-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Viza Elecs. v. Ram Dandillaya Paradigm Clinical Research Inst.

Case Details

Full title:VIZA ELECTRONICS, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. RAM DANDILLAYA PARADIGM CLINICAL…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Nov 29, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00049-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 2022)