Opinion
Civil Action No. 5:05-CV-531
07-03-2012
DAVID VIVENZIO, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SYRACUSE, Defendant.
FOR PLAINTIFF : AMDURSKY, PELKY LAW FIRM FOR DEFENDANT: CITY OF SYRACUSE CORPORATION COUNSEL HANCOCK, ESTABROOK LAW FIRM OF COUNSEL : TIMOTHY J. FENNELL, ESQ. CATHERINE CARNRIKE, ESQ. JOHN POWERS, ESQ.
APPEARANCES:
FOR PLAINTIFF:
AMDURSKY, PELKY LAW FIRM
FOR DEFENDANT:
CITY OF SYRACUSE
CORPORATION COUNSEL
HANCOCK, ESTABROOK LAW FIRM
OF COUNSEL:
TIMOTHY J. FENNELL, ESQ.
CATHERINE CARNRIKE, ESQ.
JOHN POWERS, ESQ. DAVID N. HURD
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
JUDGMENT DISMISSING ACTION
BASED UPON SETTLEMENT
The parties have entered into an agreement in settlement of all claims in this action, and that they reasonably anticipate finalizing their agreement shortly, following which this action will be discontinued, with prejudice, by stipulation pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Based upon this development, I find that it is not necessary for this action to remain on the court's active docket.
It is therefore hereby
ORDERED, as follows:
1) This action is dismissed, with prejudice, except as set forth below.
2) The court will retain complete jurisdiction to vacate this order and to reopen the action within three months from the date of this order upon cause shown that the settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary.
3) The Clerk shall forthwith serve copies of this judgment upon the parties and/or their attorneys appearing in this action by electronic means. Dated: July 3, 2012
Utica, New York
______________________
United States District Judge