From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vivatson v. Haugen

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Dec 18, 2014
858 N.W.2d 653 (N.D. 2014)

Opinion

No. 20140005.

2014-12-18

Kelsey VIVATSON, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Joshua HAUGEN, Defendant and Appellee and State of North Dakota, Real Party in Interest.

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable H. Patrick Weir, Judge.Rhiannon L. Gorham, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellant.Kari R. Winning, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellee.


Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable H. Patrick Weir, Judge.
Rhiannon L. Gorham, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellant. Kari R. Winning, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellee.
PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Kelsey Vivatson appeals from a district court judgment awarding Joshua Haugen primary residential responsibility of their minor child. Vivatson argues the district court erred in applying the best interest factors and in awarding primary residential responsibility to Haugen. We conclude the court's findings on the best interest factors and its determination to award Haugen primary residential responsibility of the child were not clearly erroneous, and we affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, LISA FAIR McEVERS, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, and DALE V. SANDSTROM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vivatson v. Haugen

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Dec 18, 2014
858 N.W.2d 653 (N.D. 2014)
Case details for

Vivatson v. Haugen

Case Details

Full title:Kelsey VIVATSON, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Joshua HAUGEN, Defendant and…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Date published: Dec 18, 2014

Citations

858 N.W.2d 653 (N.D. 2014)
2014 N.D. 215