From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vitello v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1976
351 N.E.2d 747 (N.Y. 1976)

Opinion

Argued April 29, 1976

Decided June 2, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, DANIEL BECKER, J.

Bernard Meyerson and George V. O'Haire for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Jeremiah Jochnowitz and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Appellant failed to establish, as is necessary for a recovery, that he was sane at the time of his original commitment to Dannemora State Hospital or that he recovered his sanity at any time during his subsequent 29-year stay. (Dennison v State of New York, 28 A.D.2d 608, affd 23 N.Y.2d 996, cert den 397 U.S. 923.) While not dispositive, it is significant to note that during the period in question appellant's sanity was subject to judicial review on at least eight separate occasions. Each time his commitment to Dannemora State Hospital was sustained.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Vitello v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1976
351 N.E.2d 747 (N.Y. 1976)
Case details for

Vitello v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:ALPHONSE VITELLO, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim No…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 2, 1976

Citations

351 N.E.2d 747 (N.Y. 1976)
351 N.E.2d 747
386 N.Y.S.2d 99