From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vironment, Inc. v. Light

Supreme Court of South Dakota
Apr 7, 1999
592 N.W.2d 600 (S.D. 1999)

Opinion

Considered on Briefs January 14, 1999;

Opinion Filed April 7, 1999.

Appeal from the First Judicial Circuit, Yankton County, SD, Hon. Lee A. Tappe, Judge, #20557 — Reversed.

Dennis C. McFarland, Sioux Falls, SD, Attorney for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Timothy L. James, James Associates, Yankton, SD, Attorneys for Defendant and Appellee.


[¶ 1] This is a companion case to Yankton Ethanol v. Vironment, 1999 SD 42, the cases involve identical facts and two identical issues:

1. Whether the court erred in dismissing plaintiff's complaint as barred by the period of limitation set forth in 11 U.S.C.S. 546(a)(1)(A).

2. Whether the court erred in granting the amended motion to dismiss based upon SDCL 47-7-50.

As to these issues, our decision in Yankton Ethanol controls the motion to dismiss in this case. Therefore, this case is also reversed and remanded

[¶ 2] MILLER, Chief Justice, SABERS, KONENKAMP, and GILBERTSON, Justices, concur.


Summaries of

Vironment, Inc. v. Light

Supreme Court of South Dakota
Apr 7, 1999
592 N.W.2d 600 (S.D. 1999)
Case details for

Vironment, Inc. v. Light

Case Details

Full title:VIRONMENT, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CHARLES E. LIGHT, Defendant…

Court:Supreme Court of South Dakota

Date published: Apr 7, 1999

Citations

592 N.W.2d 600 (S.D. 1999)
1999 S.D. 43