From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 16, 2018
2017-1275 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 16, 2018)

Opinion

2017-1131 2017-1132 2017-1186 2017-1274 2017-1275 2017-1276 2017-1291

03-16-2018

VIRNETX INC., Appellant v. APPLE INC., Appellee

IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by NAVEEN MODI, JOSEPH PALYS, DANIEL ZEILBERGER. JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by NATHAN S. MAMMEN; SCOTT BORDER, JEFFREY PAUL KUSHAN, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2015-00810, IPR2015-00811, IPR2015-00812, IPR2015-00866, IPR2015-00868, IPR2015-00870, IPR2015-00871.

JUDGMENT

IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by NAVEEN MODI, JOSEPH PALYS, DANIEL ZEILBERGER. JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by NATHAN S. MAMMEN; SCOTT BORDER, JEFFREY PAUL KUSHAN, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MAYER, and LOURIE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 16, 2018

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 16, 2018
2017-1275 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 16, 2018)
Case details for

Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VIRNETX INC., Appellant v. APPLE INC., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 16, 2018

Citations

2017-1275 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 16, 2018)