From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Virgil v. CDCR

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 19, 2021
2:20-cv-01373-JAM-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01373-JAM-JDP (PC)

08-19-2021

RONDELL EARL VIRGIL, Plaintiff, v. CDCR, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME ECF NO. 23

JEREMY D. PETERSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff has filed a motion for a second extension of time to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 23. Good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs motion for an extension of time, ECF No. 23, is granted.

2. Plaintiff is granted sixty days from the date of this order in which to file a second amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Virgil v. CDCR

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 19, 2021
2:20-cv-01373-JAM-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Virgil v. CDCR

Case Details

Full title:RONDELL EARL VIRGIL, Plaintiff, v. CDCR, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 19, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-01373-JAM-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2021)