From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Violation v. Qureshi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 9, 2009
61 A.D.3d 1176 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

April 9, 2009.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1994, was suspended by this Court's order dated June 7, 1999 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a ( 262 AD2d 702).

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Adnan A. Qureshi, Lahore, Pakistan, respondent pro se.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ.


Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts ( see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Ordered that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.


Summaries of

Violation v. Qureshi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 9, 2009
61 A.D.3d 1176 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Violation v. Qureshi

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 9, 2009

Citations

61 A.D.3d 1176 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2717
875 N.Y.S.2d 817