From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Viola v. Warden, California Correctional Center

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 22, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2556 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2556 LKK KJM P.

October 22, 2008


ORDER


On June 4, 2008, respondent filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the petition was filed outside the statute of limitations. Petitioner has not opposed the motion.

Local Rule 78-230(m) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion. . . ."

Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court."

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).


Summaries of

Viola v. Warden, California Correctional Center

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 22, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2556 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Viola v. Warden, California Correctional Center

Case Details

Full title:SALVADOR PAUL VIOLA, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, California Correctional…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 22, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2556 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2008)