From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

VIO CHEMICAL COMPANY v. HARTMAN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1908
126 App. Div. 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Opinion

May, 1908.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the plaintiff failed to prove the cause of action alleged; that the daughter was the agent of the defendant in the execution of the papers, and that there was no proof of partnership between the daughter and the mother. All concurred, except McLennan, P.J., who dissented upon the ground that the defendant, by failure to plead copartnership or joint liability, waived the same.


Summaries of

VIO CHEMICAL COMPANY v. HARTMAN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1908
126 App. Div. 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for

VIO CHEMICAL COMPANY v. HARTMAN

Case Details

Full title:The Vio Chemical Company, Appellant, v. Caroline Hartman, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 1, 1908

Citations

126 App. Div. 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)