Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Vinson v. State

950 So. 2d 1233 (Ala. Crim. App. 2006)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Vinson v. State

3 Citing cases

  1. McQWuieter v. State

    88 So. 3d 925 (Ala. Crim. App. 2011)

    “(Footnote omitted.) See also Vinson v. State, 950 So.2d 1233 (Ala.Crim.App.2006); White v. State, 947 So.2d 436 (Ala.Crim.App.2006).“In case number CC–94–429, the record indicates that the appellant satisfied the first two eligibility requirements set forth in Holt.

  2. Thompson v. State

    967 So. 2d 729 (Ala. Crim. App. 2007)   Cited 2 times
    In Thompson v. State, 967 So.2d 729, 730–32 (Ala.Crim.App.2007), we addressed a similar situation with regard to motions to reconsider sentences pursuant to § 13A–5–9.

    (Footnote omitted.) See also Vinson v. State, 950 So.2d 1233 (Ala.Crim.App. 2006); White v. State, 947 So.2d 436 (Ala.Crim.App. 2006). In case number CC-94-429, the record indicates that the appellant satisfied the first two eligibility requirements set forth in Holt.

  3. Turrentine v. State

    966 So. 2d 295 (Ala. Crim. App. 2007)

    " White v. State, 947 So.2d 436, 437 (Ala.Crim.App. 2006). See also Vinson v. State, 950 So.2d 1233 (Ala.Crim.App. 2006), and Ferrell v. State, 944 So.2d 162 (Ala.Crim.App. 2006). Therefore, the circuit court erred in finding that Turrentine was not eligible for sentence reconsideration solely because he had previously been paroled and that parole had been revoked.