From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vinesett v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 6, 2013
523 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-1876

06-06-2013

ROBIN J. VINESETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

Kirk J. Angel, THE ANGEL LAW FIRM, PLLC, Concord, North Carolina, for Appellant. Charles A. Gartland, II, Leslie W. Bradenham, Susan B. Molony, ALSTON & BIRD, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:10-cv-00415-MOC-DCK) Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kirk J. Angel, THE ANGEL LAW FIRM, PLLC, Concord, North Carolina, for Appellant. Charles A. Gartland, II, Leslie W. Bradenham, Susan B. Molony, ALSTON & BIRD, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robin J. Vinesett appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of United Parcel Service on his employment discrimination case. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vinesett v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., No. 3:10-cv-00415-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. June 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Vinesett v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 6, 2013
523 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Vinesett v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROBIN J. VINESETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 6, 2013

Citations

523 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Mitchell v. Convergys Corp.

Defendant notes that "to make out a prima facie case of ADEA retaliation, Plaintiff must show that: (1) she…