From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vinci v. Vasaturo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 2004
8 A.D.3d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-08180.

Decided June 1, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grays, J.), dated August 22, 2003, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Lurie Flatow, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Jay Flatow of counsel), for appellant.

Paganini, Herling, Cioci Cusumano, Lake Success, N.Y. (Charles M. Goldstein of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SANDRA L. TOWNES, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries after she twisted her ankle while descending steps at the defendant's house that were allegedly both inadequately lighted and contained height differentials in the risers. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint arguing, inter alia, that the condition complained of was open and obvious. However, on the record presented, the alleged condition merely negated a duty to warn and raised triable issues of fact as to comparative fault ( see Cupo v. Karfunkel, 1 A.D.3d 48). Accordingly, we reverse the order granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

RITTER, J.P., TOWNES, MASTRO and SKELOS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vinci v. Vasaturo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 2004
8 A.D.3d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Vinci v. Vasaturo

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPHINE VINCI, appellant, v. DIANE VASATURO, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
777 N.Y.S.2d 677

Citing Cases

Wood v. 37-18 Northern Boulevard, LLC

Here, given that the pipe may have been obscured by the other persons standing on the line, a triable issue…

Gradwohl v. Stop Shop Superm

Indeed, the defendant acknowledges that the U-boat dollies were for the use of store employees and not for…