Summary
overlooking failure to adequately explain absence of co-defendant where "[b]y his own admission, [plaintiff] clearly knows that he has not yet effected service on" co-defendants
Summary of this case from Satcher v. StanislausOpinion
CV 08-73-M-DWM-JCL.
August 1, 2008
ORDER
The Court having reviewed for clear error the Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch, and having found no clear error therein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion to remand (Doc. No. 9) is DENIED, and that the Amended Notice of Removal filed on June 23, 2008 (Doc. No. 14) takes effect and supersedes Defendant Werner's first Notice of Removal from this point forward.