From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vincent v. McDaniel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 7, 2012
Case No. 2:10-cv-01991-MMD-RJJ (D. Nev. Nov. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-cv-01991-MMD-RJJ

11-07-2012

DERRICK DEON VINCENT, Petitioner, v. E. K. MCDANIEL, et al., Respondent.


ORDER

Before the Court are petitioner's motion to receive copies of respondents' exhibits and document sheet (dkt. no. 20) and respondents' opposition (dkt. no. 21). The Court agrees with respondents. Respondents served upon petitioner two volumes of exhibits totaling more than 600 pages. Petitioner used those exhibits to prepare his traverse (dkt. no. 13). It is petitioner's responsibility to maintain possession of his volumes of the exhibits. The Court will neither assign to respondents nor take upon itself the onerous and expensive duty to send petitioner another set of the exhibits.

To the extent that petitioner's request for a document sheet is a request for the docket sheet, the Court will send him a copy.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion to receive copies of respondents' exhibits and document sheet (dkt. no. 20) is GRANTED in part. The Clerk of the Court shall send petitioner a copy of the docket sheet with this order. In all other respects, petitioner's motion is DENIED.

_________________

MIRANDA M. DU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Vincent v. McDaniel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 7, 2012
Case No. 2:10-cv-01991-MMD-RJJ (D. Nev. Nov. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Vincent v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK DEON VINCENT, Petitioner, v. E. K. MCDANIEL, et al., Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 7, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:10-cv-01991-MMD-RJJ (D. Nev. Nov. 7, 2012)