From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vinasco v. Bauknecht

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Feb 15, 2006
Case No. 3:05cv246/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 15, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:05cv246/LAC/EMT.

February 15, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before the court on Petitioner's notice of appeal and motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Docs. 21, 22). Petitioner paid the filing fee in the proceedings before this court.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, this court hereby certifies that this appeal is not taken in good faith, and Petitioner is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The reasons for this court's decision are outlined in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated December 23, 2005 (Doc. 12) and this court's order dated January 27, 2006 (Doc. 19) which adopted and incorporated that recommendation.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. 22) is DENIED, and he is directed to pay the full appellate filing fee of $255.00 within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Vinasco v. Bauknecht

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Feb 15, 2006
Case No. 3:05cv246/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 15, 2006)
Case details for

Vinasco v. Bauknecht

Case Details

Full title:EDGAR VINASCO, Petitioner, v. DONALD F. BAUKNECHT, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Feb 15, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:05cv246/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 15, 2006)