From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Villegas v. State

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Dec 13, 2012
NO. 01-12-00605-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 13, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 01-12-00605-CR

12-13-2012

ALEJANDRO LOPEZ VILLEGAS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 9

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1808792


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 21, 2012, the trial court sentenced appellant, Alejandro Lopez Villegas, and he filed a notice of appeal. On July 20, 2012, appellant timely filed a motion for new trial which the trial court granted on September 4, 2012. The granting of a motion for new trial restores the case to its position before the former trial. See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.9(b). Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because the motion for new trial was granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2. Although the appellant did not sign the motion to dismiss, the appeal was rendered moot by the order granting a new trial. See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.9(b).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

We direct the Clerk to issue the mandate within 10 days of the date of this opinion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1(c).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Brown. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

Villegas v. State

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Dec 13, 2012
NO. 01-12-00605-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Villegas v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALEJANDRO LOPEZ VILLEGAS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Dec 13, 2012

Citations

NO. 01-12-00605-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 13, 2012)

Citing Cases

Paredes v. State

Accordingly, the trial court's order granting a new trial has rendered the appeal moot. See Tex. R. App. P.…

Botello v. State

.R.App.P. 21.9(b). And such grant of a new trial renders the appeal moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.9(b); see…