From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Villaverde v. City of Orlando

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jan 7, 2020
Case No. 5D18-3842 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 7, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D18-3842

01-07-2020

CARLOS F. VILLAVERDE, Appellant, v. CITY OF ORLANDO, Appellee.

Keith L. Hammond, of Hammond Law Center, Orlando, for Appellant. Marc A. Sugerman and Wayne L. Helsby, of Allen Norton & Blue, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellee.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Administrative Appeal from the Florida Commission on Human Relations. Keith L. Hammond, of Hammond Law Center, Orlando, for Appellant. Marc A. Sugerman and Wayne L. Helsby, of Allen Norton & Blue, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellee. PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Young v. Dep't of Educ., Div. of Voc. Rehab., 943 So. 2d 901, 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (holding it is responsibility of administrative law judge to evaluate and weigh testimony and other evidence submitted at hearing to resolve factual conflicts, and to arrive at findings of fact. It is not the role of appellate court to reweigh evidence). ORFINGER, LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Villaverde v. City of Orlando

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jan 7, 2020
Case No. 5D18-3842 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 7, 2020)
Case details for

Villaverde v. City of Orlando

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS F. VILLAVERDE, Appellant, v. CITY OF ORLANDO, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 7, 2020

Citations

Case No. 5D18-3842 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 7, 2020)

Citing Cases

Melena v. Montezuma Panez

It is axiomatic that "[i]t is not the role of [an] appellate court to reweigh evidence." Villaverde v. City…