From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Villatoro v. Preston

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 5, 2022
3:16-cv-00531-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Apr. 5, 2022)

Opinion

3:16-cv-00531-MMD-CSD

04-05-2022

BALMORE ALEXANDER VILLATORO, Plaintiff v. PRESTON, et al., Defendants


ORDER RE: ECF NO. 136

Craig S. Denney, United States Magistrate Judge.

On September 3, 2021, Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb granted Plaintiff's motion to reschedule the settlement conference. Judge Cobb asked Plaintiff's counsel, Ms. Sull, and defense counsel, Mr. Rands, to explore the options available for conducting the settlement conference via video given Plaintiff's custody status with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The parties were instructed to contact courtroom administrator Karen Walker regarding the options and to provide proposed dates for the settlement conference. (ECF No. 136.)

Ms. Walker did not hear from the parties regarding logistics of a settlement conference or proposed dates. This case was subsequently reassigned to the undersigned after Judge Cobb's retirement. (ECF No. 137.) ///

Within 7 days of the date of this Order the parties shall submit a joint notice regarding the logistics of conducting a video settlement conference as well as proposed dates. If the parties fail to timely file a notice, or if the parties file a notice stating that they are unable to work out the logistics for another settlement conference, the court will issue an order requiring the filing of the joint pretrial order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Villatoro v. Preston

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 5, 2022
3:16-cv-00531-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Apr. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Villatoro v. Preston

Case Details

Full title:BALMORE ALEXANDER VILLATORO, Plaintiff v. PRESTON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 5, 2022

Citations

3:16-cv-00531-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Apr. 5, 2022)