From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Villarreal v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 30, 2014
CASE NO. 2:13-cv-15197 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 30, 2014)

Summary

noting that the claimant's applications for jobs and unemployment benefits after the alleged onset date were "obviously not consistent with his allegations of disabling pain"

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Comm'r

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:13-cv-15197

11-30-2014

JOHN VILLARREAL, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER

Plaintiff John Villarreal filed an appeal of the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's denial of his application for Disability Insurance Benefits. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Grand in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Subsequently, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. After review, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending this Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner to deny benefits because the decision was supported by substantial evidence. (Doc. 13 at 12-13).

In the R&R, the Magistrate Judge informed the parties that objections to the R&R must be filed within "fourteen (14) days of service" and a "[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal." (Id.). Neither party filed objections.

Because no objections were filed in this case, the parties waived their right to de novo review and appeal. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's R&R, GRANTS Defendant's motion for summary judgment, DENIES Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: November 30, 2014

s/Marianne O. Battani

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail to the non-ECF participants on November 30, 2014.

s/ Kay Doaks

Case Manager


Summaries of

Villarreal v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 30, 2014
CASE NO. 2:13-cv-15197 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 30, 2014)

noting that the claimant's applications for jobs and unemployment benefits after the alleged onset date were "obviously not consistent with his allegations of disabling pain"

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Comm'r
Case details for

Villarreal v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN VILLARREAL, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 30, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 2:13-cv-15197 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 30, 2014)

Citing Cases

Ring v. Berryhill

[a]pplications for unemployment and disability benefits are inherently inconsistent ... There is no…

Johnson v. Comm'r

The record in the instant matter indicates that Plaintiff applied for jobs after her alleged onset date and…