From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Villareal v. Shinn

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Jul 13, 2021
CV-20-00519-PHX-GMS (ESW) (D. Ariz. Jul. 13, 2021)

Opinion

CV-20-00519-PHX-GMS (ESW)

07-13-2021

Anthony Villareal, Jr., Plaintiff, v. David Shinn, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Eileen S. Willett United States Magistrate Judge

This matter is before the Court on its own review. On March 11, 2021, Plaintiff filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1). The Court screened Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and ordered Defendants Shinn, Thomas, and Herman to answer (Doc. 6 at 17). The Court further instructed the Plaintiff that all Defendants must be served within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of the Court's Order, whichever is later (Id. at 18). Failure to comply with the Court's Order may result in dismissal of the case (Id. at 17). On August 4, 2020, Defendants Shinn and Herman were served (Docs. 10, 11). On August 24, 2020, Defendants Shinn and Herman filed an Answer (Doc. 12).

No affidavit of service has been filed as to Defendant Thomas, and the time for service of process has passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that by August 2, 2021 Plaintiff either file an affidavit of service or show good cause why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice as to Defendant Thomas for failure to timely serve pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).


Summaries of

Villareal v. Shinn

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Jul 13, 2021
CV-20-00519-PHX-GMS (ESW) (D. Ariz. Jul. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Villareal v. Shinn

Case Details

Full title:Anthony Villareal, Jr., Plaintiff, v. David Shinn, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Jul 13, 2021

Citations

CV-20-00519-PHX-GMS (ESW) (D. Ariz. Jul. 13, 2021)