Opinion
1:15-cv-01410-DAD-EPG (PC)
06-04-2021
ELAINE K. VILLAREAL, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING DEFEDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PART
(Doc. Nos. 189, 212)
Plaintiff Elaine K. Villareal is a former state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. This action proceeds against defendant County of Fresno and defendant Mims “on plaintiff's conditions of confinement claim based on the allegedly dilapidated and decaying condition of the Fresno County South Annex Jail, including alleged conditions such as mold, fungus, crumbling walls, exposed metal, (potentially) asbestos, and an insect infestation, ” and on plaintiff's “conditions of confinement claim based on the alleged lack of access to outdoor exercise.” (Doc. No. 146 at 2.)
On April 30, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 189) be granted in part. (Doc. No. 212.) The magistrate judge recommended that summary judgment be granted in both defendants' favor on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim challenging the conditions of confinement based on the allegedly dilapidated and decaying condition of the jail, and in defendant Mims's favor on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim challenging the conditions of confinement based on alleged lack of access to sufficient exercise. (Id. at 19-20.) But the magistrate judge recommended that summary judgment be denied on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim of lack of access to sufficient exercise against defendant County of Fresno. (Id.) In addition, to the extent plaintiff intended to assert her claims against defendant Mims in her official capacity as well as her individual capacity, the magistrate judge recommended that plaintiff's claims against defendant Mims in her official capacity be dismissed. (Id.) The pending findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days after service. (Id. at 20.) To date, no objections have been filed and the time in which to do so has now passed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
Accordingly, 1. The findings and recommendations issued on April 30, 2021, (Doc. No. 212), are adopted in full;
2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 189) is granted, in part:
a. Summary judgment is granted in favor of defendant Mims on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim challenging the conditions of confinement based on the allegedly dilapidated and decaying condition of the Fresno County South Annex Jail;
b. Summary judgment is granted in favor of defendant Mims on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim challenging the conditions of confinement based on alleged lack of access to sufficient exercise;
c. Summary judgment is granted in favor of defendant County of Fresno on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim challenging the conditions of confinement based on the allegedly dilapidated and decaying condition of the Fresno County South Annex Jail; and
d. Summary judgment in favor of defendant County of Fresno is denied on plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claim challenging the conditions of confinement based on alleged lack of access to sufficient exercise;
3. Plaintiff s claims against defendant Mims in her official capacity, to the extent plaintiff intended to assert any such claims, are dismissed from this action;
4. Judgment shall be entered in favor of defendant Mims;
5. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate defendant Mims as a defendant in this action; and
6. This action is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.