From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Villanueva v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Aug 22, 2019
No. 78960-COA (Nev. App. Aug. 22, 2019)

Opinion

No. 78960-COA

08-22-2019

DENNIS VILLANUEVA, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND DIESEL MACHINE WORKS, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Petitioners, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE JAMES CROCKETT, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and CHRIS DARLING, AN INDIVIDUAL, Real Party in Interest.


ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION

This original petition for a writ of prohibition challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss in a contract action.

A writ of prohibition may be warranted when a district court acts without or in excess of its jurisdiction. See NRS 34.320; Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). This court has discretion as to whether to entertain a petition for extraordinary relief and will not do so when the petitioners have a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. See NRS 34.330; D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 123 Nev. 468, 474-75, 168 P.3d 731, 736-37 (2007). Petitioners bear the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that this court's intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. See id. Indeed, because the district court denied petitioners' motion to dismiss without prejudice pending discovery, they may still challenge the district court's exercise of personal jurisdiction in the underlying proceeding, and therefore they have a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. See, e.g., Trump v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 109 Nev. 687, 694, 857 P.2d 740, 744 (1993) (explaining that the defendant may require the plaintiff to prove personal jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence at trial or in a pretrial evidentiary hearing). Accordingly, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1); D.R. Horton, 123 Nev. at 475, 168 P.3d at 737.

It is so ORDERED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Bulla cc: Hon. James Crockett, District Judge

CV3 Legal

Michael J. Harker

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Villanueva v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Aug 22, 2019
No. 78960-COA (Nev. App. Aug. 22, 2019)
Case details for

Villanueva v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS VILLANUEVA, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND DIESEL MACHINE WORKS, LLC, A…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 22, 2019

Citations

No. 78960-COA (Nev. App. Aug. 22, 2019)