From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Villagran v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jul 21, 2022
No. 04-22-00261-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2022)

Opinion

04-22-00261-CR

07-21-2022

Jose VILLAGRAN, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee


From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021CR3653B Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Beth Watkins, Justice.

On July 11, 2022, appellant filed a motion seeking to substitute attorney Daniel De La Garza "for counsel in place and instead of appellant's current attorney, Eduardo Jimenez. The motion, which satisfies the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5, states that it was filed "in order that the record reflect Appellant's duly retained counsel of record." Accordingly, we GRANT the motion and ORDER (1) attorney Eduardo Jimenez withdrawn as counsel for appellant; and (2) attorney Daniel De La Garza substituted as attorney for appellant.


Summaries of

Villagran v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jul 21, 2022
No. 04-22-00261-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Villagran v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jose VILLAGRAN, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Jul 21, 2022

Citations

No. 04-22-00261-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2022)