From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Village of Springville v. Amherst Constr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1989
152 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

July 12, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Pine, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and defendant's cross motion granted and as modified affirmed with costs to defendant Amherst Construction, Inc., in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term properly denied plaintiff's application to vacate the arbitration proceeding (see, Sherrill v Grayco Bldrs., 64 N.Y.2d 261, 273-274; Faberge Intl. v Di Pino, 109 A.D.2d 235, 239). To effect an orderly process, however, plaintiff's action against the multiple defendants should be stayed until completion of the arbitration (see, Carthage Cent. School Dist. No. 1 v Reddick Sons, 79 A.D.2d 883, 884).


Summaries of

Village of Springville v. Amherst Constr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1989
152 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Village of Springville v. Amherst Constr

Case Details

Full title:VILLAGE OF SPRINGVILLE, Appellant-Respondent, v. AMHERST CONSTRUCTION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1989

Citations

152 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)