From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Village of Southampton v. Platt

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1978
43 N.Y.2d 848 (N.Y. 1978)

Opinion

Argued January 9, 1978

Decided February 7, 1978

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, DAVID T. GIBBONS, J.

Richard E. De Petris and Emil F. De Petris for appellant.

Elaine Platt, respondent pro se.


MEMORANDUM.

Order modified to reinstate plaintiff's complaint to the extent that it seeks to recover a fine not exceeding $250, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Section 20-2010 (subd 1, par a) of the Village Law authorizes villages to enforce ordinances by prescribing "fines for each violation thereof not to exceed two hundred fifty dollars". This provision does not permit imposition of cumulative fines in excess of $250 for a single but continuing violation (Incorporated Vil. of Mill Neck v Fronsdal, 39 A.D.2d 549, 550; see People v Briary Improvement Corp., 34 N.Y.2d 788, affg 77 Misc.2d 797, involving a similar provision in the Second Class Cities Law; cf. People v Fremd, 41 N.Y.2d 372, 374-375, construing a provision of the General City Law which contained no equivalent limitation). Hence, defendant's motion for partial summary judgment was properly granted.

Plaintiff's complaint should not, however, have been dismissed in its entirety. The notice of violation substantially complies with the notice requirement in the local ordinance. As noted by Mr. Justice MARTUSCELLO in dissent at the Appellate Division, "[i]n a civil action for penalties, there is no requirement that the removal notice served by the building inspector be based upon probable cause. Notice which is based upon a report that a violation exists, and which affords the alleged offender the opportunity to remove the violation, satisfies due process." ( 55 A.D.2d 603, 604.) Nor is there any constitutional invalidity (Village of Belle Terre v Boraas, 416 U.S. 1, 8-9; cf. City of White Plains v Ferraioli, 34 N.Y.2d 300, 305).

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order modified, without costs, in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed, and the case remitted to Supreme Court, Suffolk County.


Summaries of

Village of Southampton v. Platt

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1978
43 N.Y.2d 848 (N.Y. 1978)
Case details for

Village of Southampton v. Platt

Case Details

Full title:VILLAGE OF SOUTHAMPTON, Appellant, v. ELAINE PLATT, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 7, 1978

Citations

43 N.Y.2d 848 (N.Y. 1978)
402 N.Y.S.2d 1005
373 N.E.2d 1229

Citing Cases

People v. Multari

Imposition of cumulative fines or penalties for a single but continuing violation of a zoning ordinance is…

People v. Djekich

However, Multari relied on case precedent which involved enabling legislation which did not permit…