Opinion
July 3, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.).
Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,
Ordered that the judgments dated June 17, 1988, and June 24, 1988, respectively, are affirmed; and it is further,
Ordered that the plaintiff-respondent and the third-party defendants-respondents are awarded one bill of costs.
The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order and brought up for review and have been considered on appeal from the judgment (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
We have reviewed the defendants' claims and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or meritless. Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.