From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Villa v. Gonzalez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-001080-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-001080-BAM PC

09-06-2012

ROBERT VILLA, Plaintiff, v. F. GONZALEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION

TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS FROM

COMPLAINT


(ECF No. 11)

Plaintiff Robert Villa is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 31, 2012, Plaintiff's complaint was dismissed, with leave, to amend for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 9.) On September 4, 2012, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint and motion to dismiss defendants from the complaint. (ECF Nos. 10, 11.)

Plaintiff seeks to dismiss certain defendants that were named in the complaint. Plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and, as he was advised in the screening order, the first amended complaint supercedes the original complaint. Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir. 1987); King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987). Plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendants from complaint, filed September 4, 2012, is HEREBY DENIED as unnecessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Villa v. Gonzalez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-001080-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Villa v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT VILLA, Plaintiff, v. F. GONZALEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 6, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-001080-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2012)