From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Villa v. Berryhill

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Sep 28, 2017
No. 17-1670 (8th Cir. Sep. 28, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-1670

09-28-2017

Karen Villa Plaintiff - Appellant v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Defendant - Appellee


Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis [Unpublished] Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Karen Villa appeals the district court's order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Upon de novo review, we find no basis, and Villa offers none, for overturning the district court's determination that substantial evidence supported the denial. See Gann v. Berryhill, 864 F.3d 947, 950-51 (8th Cir. 2017) (reviewing de novo district court's decision to affirm denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income; by statute, Commissioner's findings as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, are conclusive). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable Becky R. Thorson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). --------


Summaries of

Villa v. Berryhill

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Sep 28, 2017
No. 17-1670 (8th Cir. Sep. 28, 2017)
Case details for

Villa v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:Karen Villa Plaintiff - Appellant v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Sep 28, 2017

Citations

No. 17-1670 (8th Cir. Sep. 28, 2017)