From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Viker v. Wal-Mart

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Apr 20, 2005
695 N.W.2d 97 (Minn. 2005)

Opinion

No. A05-313.

April 20, 2005.

Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals.

Steven S. Fuller, Fuller Law Firm, Rochester MN, for Appellant.

Christopher Eric Sandquist, Gislason Hunter LLP, Mankato, MN, for Respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed January 19, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Russell A. Anderson Associate Justice


Summaries of

Viker v. Wal-Mart

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Apr 20, 2005
695 N.W.2d 97 (Minn. 2005)
Case details for

Viker v. Wal-Mart

Case Details

Full title:Marti VIKER, Relator, v. WAL-MART, and AIG/Claims Management, Inc.…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Apr 20, 2005

Citations

695 N.W.2d 97 (Minn. 2005)