Opinion
No. 1D18-0866
07-15-2019
Katherine Hiett VIKER, Appellant, v. Arthur Collin CHERRY, Appellee.
Emilian "Ian" Bucataru, Tallahassee, for Appellant. A. Collin Cherry of Law Office of Collin Cherry, P.L., Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Emilian "Ian" Bucataru, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
A. Collin Cherry of Law Office of Collin Cherry, P.L., Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Per Curiam. Appellant challenges the trial court's orders pertaining to a modification of the parties' parenting plan, modification of the parties' child support arrangement, and appellant's motion for attorney's fees.
We dismiss as to the issues pertaining to the parenting plan and the child support arrangement for lack of jurisdiction because appellant failed to timely appeal those orders. Shaffer v. Shaffer , 84 So. 3d 1075 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) ; Mendoza v. Mendoza , 842 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
The sole remaining issue appellant raises is the trial court's denial of her motion for attorney's fees. We find no error with the trial court's order denying her motion and affirm accordingly.
AFFIRMED in part and DISMISSED in part.
Wolf, Rowe, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.